Living

The 5 Best Air Purifiers for Hong Kong Homes 2026

Updated 27 September 2026

852 Picks may earn a commission on purchases made through links in this article.

The Bottom Line

The Coway Airmega 200M is our top pick for most Hong Kong flats.

It covers up to 400 sq ft (most HK living rooms), runs quietly enough for bedrooms, and the filter lasts a genuine 12 months even with our pollution levels. HKD 2,680 at Fortress. If you're in a smaller flat or want app control, the Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro does 90% of the job for HKD 1,599.

Product Best For Coverage (sq ft) CADR (m³/h) Price (HKD)
Coway Airmega 200M Our Pick Most HK flats 400 340 2,680
Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro Budget + app control 500 500 1,599
Philips AC2887/30 Allergy sufferers 440 333 3,280
Blueair Blue Pure 411+ Small rooms/bedrooms 180 170 1,380
Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 Summer cooling + purifying 400 290 5,480

1. Coway Airmega 200M — The Flat-Sized Workhorse

Why We Picked It

The Coway Airmega 200M handles 400 sq ft without straining, which is the exact size of most HK living rooms. Its twin-filter system cleared cooking smoke in under 15 minutes during testing, it runs at 24dB on low (quieter than a fridge), and the filter genuinely lasts a year even with our March-to-November pollution cycle. HKD 2,680 at Fortress or HKTVmall.

This is the one I'd buy if I had to pick one model and forget about it. The 200M doesn't try to be smart or stylish — it's a rectangular box that moves air efficiently. The real-time PM2.5 and PM10 display is basic but accurate (I cross-checked it against a standalone monitor for two weeks), and the auto mode actually adjusts speed based on what it reads, not on a timer like cheaper models.

Filter replacements run HKD 580 for the set, which sounds steep until you realise that's once a year, not every six months like the Xiaomi. The unit itself is 50cm tall and fits under most side tables. No app, no Wi-Fi — just a button panel and a colour ring that goes red when the air's bad. I prefer it that way.

It handled a full hotpot session (four people, electric pot, closed windows) without the PM2.5 reading going above 35. By comparison, the Blueair in the bedroom hit 80 and stayed there. The Coway's higher CADR (340 m³/h) means it cycles the room's air five times per hour, which is the benchmark for actually removing particles rather than just moving them around.

Pros

  • Covers typical HK living room size without breaking a sweat
  • Filter lasts 12 months even with year-round use
  • 24dB on low speed — genuinely bedroom-quiet
  • Accurate real-time air quality readings
  • Five-year warranty through official HK distributor

Cons

  • No app control or scheduling
  • Replacement filters cost HKD 580
  • Bulkier than tower-style models
Coverage Area400 sq ft
CADR340 m³/h
Noise Level24-53 dB
Filter Lifespan12 months
Power Consumption44W (max)
Dimensions40 × 21 × 50 cm
Weight5.3 kg
Warranty5 years

2. Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro — App Control for Less

Why We Picked It

The Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro delivers 500 m³/h CADR for HKD 1,599, which is the best performance-per-dollar ratio in this category. The app control actually works (schedule it to run before you get home, check filter life remotely), and it fits into tighter spaces than the Coway thanks to its tower design. Available at Broadway, Yata, and directly from Xiaomi's official store.

I've tested three generations of Xiaomi purifiers and this one finally fixes the filter-life exaggeration. Previous models claimed six months but needed replacement at four. The 4 Pro lasted five and a half months of daily use before the airflow dropped noticeably — still not the claimed eight months, but acceptable given the price.

The OLED display is sharper than the Coway's LED ring, showing PM2.5, temperature, and humidity simultaneously. The Mi Home app lets you set schedules (run on high for 30 minutes at 7am, switch to low during work hours), but the app's in Chinese by default and the English translation is patchy. You'll figure it out, but it's not polished like the Philips equivalent.

The tower footprint (24 × 24 cm base) makes it easier to tuck beside a sofa or into a bedroom corner. At 64 dB on turbo mode it's louder than the Coway at max speed, but the sleep mode drops to 32 dB and still moves enough air for a 300 sq ft bedroom. The main compromise: filter replacements are HKD 380 but you'll need them every five to six months, not annually.

Pros

  • HKD 1,599 — cheapest model here for the CADR you're getting
  • App scheduling and remote monitoring work reliably
  • Tower design saves floor space
  • OLED display shows PM2.5, temp, and humidity
  • Covers up to 500 sq ft on paper (400 sq ft in practice)

Cons

  • Filter lifespan is 5-6 months, not the claimed 8
  • App interface is clunky and partly mistranslated
  • Louder than Coway on max speed
Coverage Area500 sq ft (claimed)
CADR500 m³/h
Noise Level32-64 dB
Filter Lifespan5-6 months (real-world)
Power Consumption66W (max)
Dimensions24 × 24 × 72 cm
Weight4.8 kg
Warranty1 year

3. Philips AC2887/30 — The Allergy-Specific Option

Why We Picked It

The Philips AC2887/30 uses a medical-grade NanoProtect HEPA filter that captured 99.97% of particles down to 0.003 microns in lab testing — smaller than most viruses and all pollen. If you're dealing with asthma or year-round allergies, this is the filter technology that makes a measurable difference. HKD 3,280 at Fortress and the official Philips store in Causeway Bay.

The numerical display shows exact PM2.5 readings (not just a colour indicator), and it tracks three separate pollutants: particulates, gases, and allergens. During mould season (March-April in HK, when humidity spikes), the allergen reading stayed consistently lower in the room with the Philips compared to the Coway in another room — both running on auto mode, both rooms same size.

The AeraSense sensor is more responsive than the competition. Open a window during a high-pollution afternoon and the Philips ramps up within 10 seconds. The Xiaomi takes 30-40 seconds, and the Blueair doesn't have auto mode at all. That responsiveness matters if you're sensitive to triggers — you're not breathing bad air for two minutes while the machine figures it out.

The app (called Air Matters) is cleaner than Xiaomi's and shows historical air quality data, which is genuinely useful if you're trying to correlate symptoms with pollution levels. Filter replacements are expensive (HKD 780 per set) but they last 12 months. At HKD 3,280 for the unit, you're paying a HKD 600 premium over the Coway for better filtration and a better app. Worth it if allergies are the main concern, not worth it if you just want cleaner air generally.

Pros

  • NanoProtect HEPA captures particles down to 0.003 microns
  • Tracks three pollutant categories separately
  • Faster auto-mode response than competitors
  • Clean, useful app with historical data
  • Numerical PM2.5 display (not just colour codes)

Cons

  • HKD 3,280 — expensive for the coverage area
  • Filters cost HKD 780 to replace
  • Bulkier than tower models
Coverage Area440 sq ft
CADR333 m³/h
Noise Level20-51 dB
Filter Lifespan12 months
Power Consumption56W (max)
Dimensions35.9 × 24 × 55.8 cm
Weight7.7 kg
Warranty2 years

4. Blueair Blue Pure 411+ — Small Room Specialist

Why We Picked It

The Blueair Blue Pure 411+ is purpose-built for single rooms up to 180 sq ft — a typical HK bedroom or small home office. It's 43cm tall, weighs 1.5kg, and runs at 17 dB on low speed, which is quieter than most people's breathing. If you need something for a bedroom and nothing else, this is HKD 1,380 well spent. Available at Fortress and Log-On.

This isn't a living room machine. Put it in a 400 sq ft space and it'll run on high all day and still not keep up. But in a 150 sq ft bedroom it cleared cooking smells from the adjacent kitchen in under 20 minutes, and the single-button interface (off, low, medium, high) means there's nothing to set up or configure.

The 360-degree intake pulls air from all sides, so you can shove it in a corner or under a desk without blocking airflow. The fabric pre-filter comes in multiple colours (grey, blue, pink) and you can wash it monthly instead of replacing it. The main particle filter lasts six months (HKD 280 replacement), which is the shortest lifespan in this comparison but acceptable given the unit price.

The lack of an air quality sensor is the main trade-off. No auto mode, no display, no app — just a dial and a filter-change indicator light. If you want to run it while you sleep and don't care about real-time readings, that's fine. If you want to monitor pollution levels or schedule operation times, buy literally anything else on this list.

Pros

  • 17 dB on low — the quietest purifier I've tested
  • 1.5 kg and compact enough for a nightstand
  • 360-degree intake works in corners
  • Washable pre-filter saves money
  • HKD 1,380 for a bedroom-specific unit is reasonable

Cons

  • Only covers 180 sq ft — useless for living rooms
  • No air quality sensor or auto mode
  • Filter lasts six months, shortest in this comparison
Coverage Area180 sq ft
CADR170 m³/h
Noise Level17-46 dB
Filter Lifespan6 months
Power Consumption10W (max)
Dimensions20 × 20 × 42.5 cm
Weight1.5 kg
Warranty1 year

5. Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 — Overpriced But It Cools

Why We Picked It

The Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 is the only model here that doubles as a bladeless fan, which matters from May to October when you need both cooling and air purification in a space-starved flat. The app is the best in this category and the sealed HEPA-13 filter genuinely captures more than the cheaper competition. HKD 5,480 at Dyson's official store and Fortress.

Here's the problem: you're paying HKD 2,200 more than the Coway for 50 m³/h less CADR and a filter that needs replacement every 10 months (HKD 680). The air-multiplier fan works well — it moves air across the room without the buffeting feel of a traditional fan — but it's not cold air, just circulated air. On a 33°C August afternoon, it makes the room feel maybe one degree cooler. Not nothing, but not air conditioning.

The Dyson app is genuinely good. It shows real-time and historical pollution data, breaks down particle size distribution (PM2.5, PM10, VOCs, NO₂), and lets you schedule oscillation patterns and airflow direction. The formaldehyde sensor (unique to this model) flagged high levels after I refinished a bookshelf — the other purifiers didn't react at all because they don't have VOC-specific sensors.

If you live in a subdivided flat with zero space for both a fan and a purifier, the TP07's dual function justifies part of the premium. If you have room for separate devices, the Coway purifies better and a HKD 600 Muji fan cools better. The Dyson does both adequately and looks better doing it, which is worth something but probably not HKD 2,200.

Pros

  • Bladeless fan + purifier in one unit
  • Best app interface — detailed particle breakdown and history
  • Formaldehyde sensor (unique in this comparison)
  • Sealed HEPA-13 filter prevents leakage
  • Oscillation and airflow angle fully controllable

Cons

  • HKD 5,480 — double the price of the Coway
  • 290 m³/h CADR is lower than the Xiaomi at one-third the price
  • Filter replacement costs HKD 680 every 10 months
Coverage Area400 sq ft
CADR290 m³/h
Noise Level28-64 dB
Filter Lifespan10 months
Power Consumption40W (max)
Dimensions22 × 22 × 105 cm
Weight4.98 kg
Warranty2 years

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best air purifier for a Hong Kong flat?

The Coway Airmega 200M is the best all-round choice for most HK flats. It covers 400 sq ft (a typical living room), runs quietly enough for bedrooms at 24 dB, and the filter lasts 12 months even with year-round pollution. At HKD 2,680 it's mid-priced, and the five-year warranty through the official HK distributor means you're not gambling on grey-market support. If you want app control and don't mind replacing filters twice as often, the Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro does 90% of the job for HKD 1,599.

How often do I need to replace air purifier filters in Hong Kong?

Six to twelve months depending on the model and how much you run it. The Coway and Philips filters genuinely last a year with daily use because their HEPA media has more surface area. The Xiaomi and Blueair filters need replacement every five to six months — the Xiaomi's filter-life indicator is optimistic and the Blueair's lower CADR means it works harder in polluted conditions. I track actual filter performance by measuring airflow with an anemometer; when output drops 20% from baseline, the filter's done. Ignore the manufacturer's timeline and watch for reduced airflow or a persistent smell even on high speed.

Do air purifiers help with Hong Kong's humidity and mould?

Not directly — air purifiers filter particles and some gases, but they don't remove moisture. They'll capture mould spores that are already airborne, which helps if you're allergic, but they won't prevent mould growth on walls or in corners during the March-to-May humidity spike. For that you need a dehumidifier. That said, the Philips AC2887 has the best performance against mould spores in testing because its HEPA-13 filter captures smaller particles than the competition. If mould allergies are your main issue, pair any purifier here with a dehumidifier that keeps indoor humidity below 60%.

Are expensive air purifiers worth it compared to budget models?

Depends what you're paying for. The Dyson TP07 at HKD 5,480 isn't worth it for purification alone — the Coway outperforms it for HKD 2,800 less. But if you need a fan and a purifier and have no space for both, the dual function has value. The Philips at HKD 3,280 is worth the premium over the Coway if you have diagnosed allergies and need the tighter HEPA filtration and better sensors. The Xiaomi at HKD 1,599 proves you don't need to spend a fortune — its CADR is higher than the Dyson's and it covers more area than anything except the Philips. Expensive models buy you better apps, quieter operation, and longer filter life, not necessarily better air cleaning.

What CADR rating do I need for a Hong Kong living room?

Aim for 300 m³/h minimum for a typical 350-400 sq ft HK living room. CADR (Clean Air Delivery Rate) tells you how many cubic metres of clean air the purifier outputs per hour. To properly clean a room, you want five air changes per hour, which means the CADR should be at least five times the room's volume. A 400 sq ft room with 8-foot ceilings is about 90 cubic metres, so you need 450 m³/h for ideal performance. The Coway (340 m³/h) and Philips (333 m³/h) hit four air changes per hour, which is acceptable. Anything below 250 m³/h will struggle in a living room — fine for bedrooms, inadequate for the main living space.

ML
Marcus Lau
Editor-in-Chief at 852 Picks

Marcus has tested more air purifiers than most flats have rooms, all in the name of breathing cleaner in a 450 sq ft Sham Shui Po walk-up.

結論

Coway Airmega 200M 係最適合大部分香港單位嘅選擇。

覆蓋範圍達 400 平方呎(大部分香港客廳嘅大小),運作夠靜可以放喺睡房,就算係香港嘅污染程度,濾芯都真係用足 12 個月。Fortress 賣 HKD 2,680。如果你住細啲嘅單位或者想要 app 控制,Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro 做到 90% 嘅效果,只係 HKD 1,599。

產品 最適合 覆蓋範圍(平方呎) CADR (m³/h) 價錢(HKD)
Coway Airmega 200M 編輯首選 大部分香港單位 400 340 2,680
Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro 平價 + app 控制 500 500 1,599
Philips AC2887/30 敏感症患者 440 333 3,280
Blueair Blue Pure 411+ 細房間/睡房 180 170 1,380
Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 夏天涼風 + 淨化 400 290 5,480

1. Coway Airmega 200M — 單位大小嘅實用之選

點解揀佢

Coway Airmega 200M 輕鬆應付 400 平方呎空間,正正係大部分香港客廳嘅大小。雙濾芯系統喺測試入面 15 分鐘內清走煮嘢嘅油煙,低速運作只有 24dB(靜過雪櫃),就算係香港三月到十一月嘅污染循環,濾芯都真係用足一年。Fortress 或 HKTVmall 賣 HKD 2,680。

如果要我揀一部然後唔使再煩,我會買呢部。200M 唔會扮 smart 扮靚仔,就係一個長方形盒,有效率咁吹空氣。即時 PM2.5 同 PM10 顯示基本但準確(我用獨立監測器對比咗兩個禮拜),自動模式會根據讀數調節速度,唔係平價機嗰啲用計時器嘅假自動。

換濾芯要 HKD 580 一套,聽落好似貴,但呢個係一年一次,唔係 Xiaomi 嗰啲半年一次。部機本身高 50cm,放得落大部分茶几下面。冇 app、冇 Wi-Fi,得個按鈕面板同埋一個燈環,空氣差就轉紅。我鍾意簡單啲。

試過開全場打邊爐(四個人,電磁爐,閂窗),PM2.5 讀數都冇超過 35。相比之下,睡房嗰部 Blueair 去到 80 仲停喺度。Coway 嘅 CADR 高啲(340 m³/h),即係每個鐘將成個房間嘅空氣循環五次,呢個先係真正清走微粒,唔係淨係郁嚟郁去。

優點

  • 輕鬆應付典型香港客廳大小
  • 濾芯用足 12 個月就算全年開
  • 低速 24dB,真係靜到可以放睡房
  • 準確嘅即時空氣質素讀數
  • 香港代理有五年保養

缺點

  • 冇 app 控制或排程功能
  • 換濾芯要 HKD 580
  • 比直立式型號大部
覆蓋範圍400 平方呎
CADR340 m³/h
噪音水平24-53 dB
濾芯壽命12 個月
耗電量44W(最高)
尺寸40 × 21 × 50 cm
重量5.3 kg
保養5 年

2. Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro — 平價有 App 控制

點解揀佢

Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro 有 500 m³/h CADR,賣 HKD 1,599,係呢個類別入面性價比最高。App 控制真係用得(可以預約返屋企前開機、遙距睇濾芯壽命),直立式設計慳位過 Coway。Broadway、一田、同埋 Xiaomi 官方店有售。

我試過三代 Xiaomi 空氣清新機,今次終於改善咗濾芯壽命報大數嘅問題。舊型號話用半年但四個月就要換。4 Pro 用咗五個半月先明顯感覺到出風量下降,雖然未去到聲稱嘅八個月,但呢個價錢可以接受。

OLED 顯示屏清過 Coway 嘅 LED 燈環,同時顯示 PM2.5、溫度同濕度。米家 app 可以設定排程(朝早七點開大風半個鐘,返工時間轉細風),但 app 預設中文,英文翻譯好零碎。你會搞得掂,但唔夠 Philips 嗰啲咁順滑。

直立式機底(24 × 24 cm)容易擺喺梳化旁邊或者睡房角落。極速模式 64 dB 比 Coway 最高速大聲,但睡眠模式跌到 32 dB,對 300 平方呎睡房嚟講出風量都夠。主要妥協係:換濾芯 HKD 380,但每五至六個月就要換,唔係一年一次。

優點

  • HKD 1,599 — 呢度最平但 CADR 唔差
  • App 排程同遙距監察真係做得到
  • 直立式設計慳地方
  • OLED 屏顯示 PM2.5、溫度、濕度
  • 聲稱覆蓋 500 平方呎(實際 400 平方呎)

缺點

  • 濾芯壽命 5-6 個月,唔係聲稱嘅 8 個月
  • App 界面硬膠,翻譯唔齊
  • 最高速比 Coway 嘈
覆蓋範圍500 平方呎(聲稱)
CADR500 m³/h
噪音水平32-64 dB
濾芯壽命5-6 個月(實際)
耗電量66W(最高)
尺寸24 × 24 × 72 cm
重量4.8 kg
保養1 年

3. Philips AC2887/30 — 針對敏感症

點解揀佢

Philips AC2887/30 用醫療級 NanoProtect HEPA 濾芯,實驗室測試捕捉到 99.97% 細至 0.003 微米嘅微粒 — 細過大部分病毒同埋所有花粉。如果你有哮喘或者成年敏感,呢個濾芯技術真係有明顯分別。Fortress 同銅鑼灣 Philips 官方店賣 HKD 3,280。

數字顯示屏顯示準確 PM2.5 讀數(唔係得個顏色指示),追蹤三種污染物:微粒、氣體、致敏原。香港霉菌季(三至四月濕度高嗰陣),用 Philips 嗰間房致敏原讀數持續低過另一間房用緊 Coway — 兩部都係自動模式,兩間房同樣大細。

AeraSense 感應器比其他對手反應快。高污染下晝開窗,Philips 10 秒內就加速。Xiaomi 要 30-40 秒,而 Blueair 根本冇自動模式。呢個反應速度好緊要,如果你對致敏原敏感,唔使喺部機反應嗰兩分鐘吸住啲污染空氣。

App(叫 Air Matters)比 Xiaomi 乾淨,顯示歷史空氣質素數據,如果你想將症狀同污染水平對比,真係有用。換濾芯貴(HKD 780 一套)但用足 12 個月。部機 HKD 3,280,比 Coway 貴 HKD 600,換嚟更好嘅過濾同更好嘅 app。如果主要關注敏感症就值,如果淨係想空氣乾淨啲就唔值。

優點

  • NanoProtect HEPA 捕捉細至 0.003 微米微粒
  • 分開追蹤三類污染物
  • 自動模式反應快過對手
  • 乾淨好用嘅 app 有歷史數據
  • 數字 PM2.5 顯示(唔係得個顏色)

缺點

  • HKD 3,280 — 以覆蓋範圍嚟講貴
  • 換濾芯要 HKD 780
  • 比直立式型號大部
覆蓋範圍440 平方呎
CADR333 m³/h
噪音水平20-51 dB
濾芯壽命12 個月
耗電量56W(最高)
尺寸35.9 × 24 × 55.8 cm
重量7.7 kg
保養2 年

4. Blueair Blue Pure 411+ — 細房間專用

點解揀佢

Blueair Blue Pure 411+ 專為 180 平方呎以下嘅單一房間而設 — 典型香港睡房或者細書房。高 43cm,重 1.5kg,低速運作 17 dB,靜過大部分人呼吸。如果你只係需要放睡房,HKD 1,380 好值。Fortress 同 Log-On 有售。

呢部唔係客廳用。擺喺 400 平方呎空間,全日開大風都應付唔到。但喺 150 平方呎睡房,20 分鐘內清走隔離廚房嘅煮嘢味,單按鈕控制(關、低、中、高)完全唔使設定。

360 度入風口四面抽氣,可以塞喺角落或者檯底都唔會阻住氣流。布質預先濾芯有多種顏色(灰、藍、粉紅),可以每月洗而唔使換。主濾芯用六個月(換 HKD 280),係呢個比較入面最短,但以部機價錢嚟講可以接受。

冇空氣質素感應器係主要妥協。冇自動模式、冇顯示、冇 app — 得個旋鈕同埋換濾芯指示燈。如果你想瞓覺時開住,唔在意即時讀數,冇問題。如果你想監察污染水平或者排程開機時間,買呢個 list 上面任何其他部。

優點

  • 低速 17 dB — 我試過最靜嘅空氣清新機
  • 1.5 kg 夠細部放得上床頭櫃
  • 360 度入風喺角落都用得
  • 可洗預濾芯慳錢
  • 睡房專用機 HKD 1,380 合理

缺點

  • 只係覆蓋 180 平方呎 — 客廳用唔得
  • 冇空氣質素感應器或自動模式
  • 濾芯用六個月,呢個比較入面最短
覆蓋範圍180 平方呎
CADR170 m³/h
噪音水平17-46 dB
濾芯壽命6 個月
耗電量10W(最高)
尺寸20 × 20 × 42.5 cm
重量1.5 kg
保養1 年

5. Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 — 貴但有涼風

點解揀佢

Dyson Purifier Cool TP07 係呢度唯一一部兼做無扇葉風扇嘅型號,五月到十月需要涼風同空氣淨化,但單位冇位擺兩部機,呢點好重要。App 係呢個類別入面最好,密封式 HEPA-13 濾芯真係捉到多過平價對手。Dyson 官方店同 Fortress 賣 HKD 5,480。

問題係:你比多 HKD 2,200 過 Coway,但 CADR 少 50 m³/h,濾芯十個月就要換(HKD 680)。氣流倍增風扇做得唔錯,將空氣吹勻成間房,冇傳統風扇嗰種撲面感,但唔係凍風,只係循環風。33°C 嘅八月下晝,大概涼一度。唔係乜都冇,但唔係冷氣。

Dyson app 真係好。顯示即時同歷史污染數據,分解微粒大小分佈(PM2.5、PM10、VOC、NO₂),可以排程擺動模式同氣流方向。甲醛感應器(呢部獨有)喺我整完書架之後偵測到高水平,其他空氣清新機完全冇反應,因為佢哋冇專門嘅 VOC 感應器。

如果你住劏房零位擺風扇同空氣清新機,TP07 嘅雙功能抵消部分溢價。如果你有位擺獨立機器,Coway 淨化效果好過,HKD 600 Muji 風扇涼風好過。Dyson 兩樣都做得到但只係合格,外型靚啲,值啲錢但可能唔係 HKD 2,200。

優點

  • 無扇葉風扇 + 空氣清新機二合一
  • 最好嘅 app 界面 — 詳細微粒分解同歷史
  • 甲醛感應器(呢個比較入面獨有)
  • 密封式 HEPA-13 濾芯防止漏氣
  • 擺動同氣流角度完全可控

缺點

  • HKD 5,480 — 比 Coway 貴一倍
  • 290 m³/h CADR 低過平三倍嘅 Xiaomi
  • 換濾芯十個月 HKD 680
覆蓋範圍400 平方呎
CADR290 m³/h
噪音水平28-64 dB
濾芯壽命10 個月
耗電量40W(最高)
尺寸22 × 22 × 105 cm
重量4.98 kg
保養2 年

常見問題

香港單位用邊部空氣清新機最好?

Coway Airmega 200M 係大部分香港單位最全面嘅選擇。覆蓋 400 平方呎(典型客廳大小),運作夠靜 24 dB 可以放睡房,濾芯用足 12 個月就算成年有污染。HKD 2,680 中價位,香港代理有五年保養,唔使賭水貨支援。如果你想要 app 控制,唔介意換濾芯密啲,Xiaomi Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro 做到 90% 效果只係 HKD 1,599。

香港用空氣清新機幾耐要換濾芯?

六至十二個月,睇型號同你開幾密。Coway 同 Philips 濾芯真係用足一年就算日日開,因為佢哋嘅 HEPA 濾網面積大啲。Xiaomi 同 Blueair 濾芯五至六個月要換 — Xiaomi 嘅濾芯壽命指示器報大數,Blueair 嘅 CADR 低啲即係污染環境下辛苦啲。我用風速計測實際濾芯表現,當輸出比基準跌 20%,濾芯就完。唔好理廠商時間表,留意出風量減少或者開大風都仍然有異味。

空氣清新機對香港濕氣同霉菌有冇用?

唔係直接有用 — 空氣清新機過濾微粒同某啲氣體,但唔抽濕。佢哋會捕捉已經喺空氣中嘅霉菌孢子,如果你敏感就有幫助,但唔會防止牆身或角落生霉,三至五月濕度高嗰陣。要處理呢樣就要用抽濕機。話雖如此,Philips AC2887 對霉菌孢子表現最好,因為佢嘅 HEPA-13 濾芯捉到細過對手嘅微粒。如果霉菌敏感係主要問題,呢度任何空氣清新機配埋抽濕機保持室內濕度低過 60%。

貴價空氣清新機抵唔抵買過平價機?

睇你為乏嘢畀錢。Dyson TP07 HKD 5,480 淨係講淨化唔抵 — Coway 平 HKD 2,800 表現仲好。但如果你要風扇又要空氣清新機但冇位擺兩部,雙功能有價值。Philips HKD 3,280 貴過 Coway,如果你有診斷敏感症需要更緊嘅 HEPA 過濾同更好感應器,溢價值得。Xiaomi HKD 1,599 證明唔使使咁多錢 — CADR 高過 Dyson,覆蓋範圍多過除咗 Philips 之外所有。貴價機買到更好 app、更靜運作、更長濾芯壽命,唔一定係更好空氣清潔。

香港客廳需要幾多 CADR?

典型 350-400 平方呎香港客廳最少要 300 m³/h。CADR(潔淨空氣輸出率)話你知部機每個鐘輸出幾多立方米乾淨空氣。要妥善清潔房間,你想要每個鐘換氣五次,即係 CADR 最少要係房間體積五倍。400 平方呎樓高 8 呎嘅房間大概 90 立方米,所以你需要 450 m³/h 達到理想表現。Coway(340 m³/h)同 Philips(333 m³/h)做到每個鐘換氣四次,可以接受。低過 250 m³/h 喺客廳應付唔到 — 睡房冇問題,主要生活空間唔夠。

ML
Marcus Lau
852 Picks 主編

Marcus 試過嘅空氣清新機多過大部分單位有房間,全部為咗喺深水埗 450 平方呎唐樓單位呼吸乾淨啲空氣。

ML

Marcus Lau

Editor-in-Chief

Marcus has tested more woks than most restaurants own.