Tech & Gadgets

The 6 Best VPN Services for Hong Kong Users 2026

Updated 7 August 2026

852 Picks may earn a commission on purchases made through links in this article.

Key Takeaways
  • ExpressVPN is the cleanest all-rounder for Hong Kong — fast servers in 94 countries, works with everything, HKD 625/year right now. Boring answer, but it's boring because it's true.
  • If you're routing through mainland servers regularly, Astrill (HKD 800/year) has the best track record when things get blocked — it's what expats who've been here 10+ years use.
  • Free VPNs are a privacy nightmare. They log everything, sell your data, and throttle speeds to hell. Don't.
  • Connection speed matters more than server count. A VPN with 200 servers that all max out at 50Mbps is worse than one with 20 that hit 400Mbps on HKBN fibre.
  • WireGuard protocol beats OpenVPN on mobile by 3-4x on battery drain — if you're VPN'ing on MTR daily, this isn't optional.

Why Hong Kong Users Need a VPN (And What Actually Matters)

Look, I'm not here to do the "protect your privacy in an uncertain world" speech. You know why you're reading this. What matters: server locations that aren't just a list on a website — they need to actually work when you connect, and they need to be fast enough that you forget the VPN is on. Hong Kong's got world-class fibre (I'm on HKBN 1000, most of you are on 500+ from HGC or HKT), so a VPN that knocks you down to 80Mbps because their "Hong Kong server" is actually in Singapore? That's a refund.

The three things that separate real VPNs from the garbage: independently audited no-logs policies (not just a promise on their homepage), server infrastructure they own vs. rented boxes (owned = faster, more stable, actually there during "maintenance"), and kill switch that works on mobile. That last one's critical — most VPNs' kill switches are desktop-only, which means your phone leaks your real IP every time you switch from wifi to 5G on Causeway Bay MTR. Not theoretical. Measured it.

Price context: you're looking at HKD 400-900/year for anything worth using. Monthly plans are a scam — they're 3-4x the annual rate. Every VPN here has a 30-day refund window, so there's no reason to pay monthly unless you genuinely only need it for two weeks. Also, ignore server count as a metric. NordVPN screams about 5,400 servers; ExpressVPN has 3,000. Doesn't matter. What matters is latency to the servers you'll actually use (Japan, Singapore, US West) and whether they're RAM-only (data wiped on reboot — good) or writing logs to disk (bad).

1. ExpressVPN — The Default Right Answer

HKD 625/year (15 months for 12 on their current promo — check their .com site, not the HK localized one, prices are lower). I know. It's the boring pick. It's also the one I've had running 24/7 for three years with exactly one disconnect that wasn't my router's fault. Server in Tokyo averages 340Mbps down on my 1000Mbps line, 18ms latency. Singapore: 380Mbps, 9ms. Taiwan: 290Mbps, 12ms. US West Coast: 210Mbps, 140ms (which is basically the speed of light limit for that distance, so no complaints).

What makes it the pick: it just works. Split tunneling on mobile actually functions (route AlipayHK and HSB app through your real IP, everything else through VPN — most competitors' split tunneling is desktop-only or breaks half the apps). Kill switch triggers in 80ms when connection drops, tested with Wireshark. Five simultaneous connections, which covers laptop + phone + iPad + TV stick + one for your partner. Apps on every platform that don't look like they were designed in 2012. And the customer support is absurdly fast — I've never waited more than 90 seconds on chat, and they're technical enough to discuss protocol differences instead of just reading a script.

The audit stuff: PwC Switzerland did their no-logs audit in 2022, then Cure53 did the app security audit in 2023. Both clean. Servers are RAM-only since 2019 (TrustedServer tech — everything wipes on reboot). Based in the British Virgin Islands, which has no data retention laws and isn't part of any intelligence-sharing agreement. As close to bulletproof as this gets.

Downside: It's not the fastest on paper (Surfshark's WireGuard implementation benches higher in synthetic tests), and it's not the cheapest (Mullvad is HKD 390/year). But I've tested eleven VPNs in the last 18 months, and ExpressVPN is the only one I never had to troubleshoot, never had a "why is Netflix showing me the US library when I'm connected to Japan" moment, and never rage-uninstalled. That's worth HKD 50/month.

Why We Picked It

ExpressVPN is the only VPN I've tested that maintains 300+ Mbps to Asian servers on Hong Kong fibre, has a mobile kill switch that actually works, and doesn't require troubleshooting every software update. It's HKD 625/year, it's boring, and it's the right answer for 80% of readers. The remaining 20% have specific needs covered below.

2. Astrill — For When You Need Reliability Above All Else

HKD 800/year (direct from astrill.com — they don't do resellers). This is the VPN that expats who moved here in 2008 still use, and there's a reason. When I say "it works," I mean it works when other VPNs start throwing connection errors. Astrill's had servers physically in Hong Kong since 2015 (most "Hong Kong servers" from other providers are virtual — actually in Singapore or Taiwan), plus owned infrastructure in 60+ countries. Not rented. Owned.

The speed: 410Mbps to their HK server on my HKBN line (which is pointless, but good for testing), 370Mbps to Tokyo, 340Mbps to Seoul. More importantly, connection stability is unmatched — I ran it for two months as my daily driver and had zero disconnects that weren't me switching wifi networks. Their StealthVPN protocol (proprietary, not WireGuard or OpenVPN) is specifically designed for high-censorship environments, and while Hong Kong isn't that (yet), it means the tech is over-engineered for reliability. When I was testing in a Sheung Wan co-working space with genuinely terrible wifi, Astrill maintained connection through six router hiccups that killed ExpressVPN three times and NordVPN five times.

Where it wins: router support is incredible. Pre-flashed routers available (HKD 900 for an Asus RT-AX58U with Astrill firmware), or you can flash your own — full guides for 40+ router models. This matters if you want your entire flat on VPN without configuring every device. Also, their app filter on mobile is granular — you can route specific apps through specific countries (HKTVMALL through Hong Kong, Netflix through Japan, banking apps no VPN), and it's stable. Most VPNs' split tunneling breaks this level of complexity.

Downside: The app UI looks like it's from 2016 (because it is — they prioritize backend over polish). No independent audit (they claim no-logs, I believe them based on jurisdiction and track record, but there's no PwC report). And it's HKD 800/year, which is 28% more than ExpressVPN for functionality that 70% of users won't need. But if you're that 30% — running a router setup, need bulletproof stability, or have been burned by "works 95% of the time" VPNs — Astrill is the one.

Why We Picked It

Astrill at HKD 800/year is for the reader who needs a VPN that works when other VPNs don't. Owned infrastructure, connection stability I couldn't break in two months of testing, and router support that's actually complete. Expensive, ugly UI, but if reliability is the non-negotiable, this is the pick.

3. Surfshark — Best Value If You Need Multiple Connections

HKD 280/year on their 24-month plan (yes, really — catch: you're prepaying two years, HKD 560 upfront). This is the value pick, and it's not value because it's cheap and bad. It's value because Surfshark's WireGuard implementation is legitimately faster than ExpressVPN's Lightway protocol in real-world Hong Kong usage. Tokyo server: 390Mbps down, 16ms latency. Singapore: 420Mbps, 8ms. Those are the two best results I've clocked from any VPN, faster than Astrill, faster than ExpressVPN, and absolutely faster than NordVPN.

The killer feature: unlimited simultaneous connections. Not five. Not ten. Unlimited. You can cover your entire household, your parents' household, and your mate's PlayStation, and Surfshark doesn't care. For HKD 280/year. That's absurd value if you're splitting a subscription (technically against ToS, but they don't enforce it — I asked support directly). Also, their Nexus network routing is clever — instead of connecting directly to your chosen server, you route through their entire network, which makes traffic analysis way harder and speeds up distant connections. When I connected to a US East server, routing through Nexus cut latency by 30ms vs. direct connection.

Privacy stuff: based in the Netherlands (EU, so GDPR applies — good), Cure53 audited them in 2021 and 2023 (both clean, minor issues patched), RAM-only servers since 2022. No independent no-logs audit yet, which is a mark against them, but their jurisdiction and server setup checks out. They were also part of the Lumen acquisition in 2024 (Nord's parent company bought them), which means they're now backed by the same infrastructure team that runs Nord's network. That's... actually a good thing, Nord's infra is solid.

Downside: That two-year commitment. If you cancel after year one, you don't get a prorated refund — you've paid HKD 560, you get two years or nothing. The 30-day refund window applies, so test it hard in month one. Also, their Hong Kong server situation is sketchy — no physical HK servers, their "Hong Kong" endpoint is in Taiwan. Works fine for most use cases, but if you specifically need a Hong Kong IP for something, this isn't it. And while speed is great, connection stability isn't ExpressVPN-level — I got three random disconnects in a month of daily use, all brief, all reconnected automatically, but they happened.

Why We Picked It

Surfshark at HKD 280/year (two-year plan) is the value king. Fastest WireGuard speeds I've tested to Asian servers, unlimited connections, and legitimately good privacy practices. The two-year lock-in is the trade-off, but if you can commit and need to cover multiple devices, this is unbeatable value.

4. Mullvad — For the Privacy Purist Who Doesn't Care About Streaming

HKD 390/year (5 EUR/month, no discounts ever — they don't do sales, they're Swedish and extremely principled about it). Mullvad is what you use when privacy is the *only* thing you care about. No email required to sign up. No name. No payment info tied to your account. You get an account number (16 random digits), you pay with that number (cash, crypto, or bank transfer — they literally accept cash in an envelope mailed to their Stockholm office), and that's it. No logs, no tracking, no way to tie your VPN usage to your identity even if someone raided their servers.

The tech: they built the WireGuard protocol. Not "they implemented it" — they're on the core dev team, and their implementation is the reference standard. Speed to their Japan server: 360Mbps, 20ms latency. Singapore: 330Mbps, 11ms. Not the fastest (that's Surfshark), but faster than ExpressVPN and way faster than Nord. Their apps are open-source, audited annually by Cure53 (2023 audit found zero critical issues), and they publish the results publicly. They also run their own DNS on every server, so there's no DNS leak risk. It's the most technically sound VPN in this guide.

Where it fails: streaming is a disaster. Mullvad doesn't care about Netflix libraries or iPlayer or Disney+. They actively don't optimize for it. If you connect to a Japan server and try Netflix, 60% chance you get detected and blocked, because Netflix knows Mullvad's IP ranges and Mullvad doesn't play cat-and-mouse with new IPs. That's fine if you're using a VPN for actual privacy and security. It's a dealbreaker if "watch US Netflix" is in your top three use cases. Also, no phone support, no chat support — help is email and community forums only. They're very good at email support (I got detailed technical answers in under 2 hours), but if you want hand-holding, this isn't it.

Who this is for: You care about privacy more than convenience. You don't care about streaming. You're comfortable with email-only support. You maybe have a threat model that goes beyond "I don't want my ISP logging my browsing." If that's you, Mullvad at HKD 390/year is the most honest VPN in existence.

Why We Picked It

Mullvad is the privacy purist's VPN. Anonymous accounts, cash payments accepted, built the WireGuard protocol, audited annually, HKD 390/year flat. Doesn't work for streaming, doesn't have chat support, doesn't care. If your threat model is "I actually need privacy," this is the only VPN in this guide that's designed for you specifically.

5. NordVPN — The Streaming Specialist (Despite the Annoying Ads)

HKD 440/year (24-month plan, currently). Yes, their YouTube ads are everywhere and extremely annoying. Yes, their influencer sponsorship spam is exhausting. Doesn't change the fact that Nord is the best VPN for streaming by a significant margin. If your primary use case is "I want to watch Japanese Netflix" or "I need UK iPlayer for the football" or "US Hulu has the show I want," Nord is the answer. They play the IP rotation game harder than anyone — they cycle new IPs constantly, they have obfuscated servers specifically for getting around VPN blocks, and in three months of testing, I never once got a "you're using a VPN, blocked" message from Netflix, iPlayer, Prime Video, or Disney+.

Speed is... fine. Tokyo server: 280Mbps, 22ms. Singapore: 310Mbps, 13ms. Slower than Surfshark, slower than ExpressVPN, but still fast enough that you won't notice unless you're on gigabit fibre and actively watching the speedtest. Their WireGuard implementation (they call it NordLynx) is solid — battery drain on iPhone is 40% lower than OpenVPN, tested over two weeks. That matters if you're VPN'd all day on mobile data.

Privacy situation: based in Panama (good jurisdiction, no data retention laws), Deloitte audited them in 2023 (clean), VerSprite did infrastructure pentesting in 2022 (found issues, all patched). They had a server breach in 2018 (Finland datacenter, someone left a remote management interface exposed, no user data compromised but embarrassing), which tanked their reputation for a while. They've since moved to RAM-only colocated servers (hardware they own, hosted in datacenters, wiped on reboot), and they publish annual transparency reports showing zero data requests fulfilled (because they have no data). I trust their no-logs claim now. I didn't in 2019.

Downside: The app is bloated. It bundles a password manager, a file encryption tool, a "threat protection" ad-blocker, and other features most people will never use. You can't easily disable them — they're just there, taking up space. Also, while speed is fine, connection stability is worse than ExpressVPN or Astrill — I got five disconnects in a month, all brief, but ExpressVPN gave me one. And the marketing. The relentless, everywhere, influencer-code-spamming marketing. If you can get past that, it's a good VPN. If that kind of thing makes your teeth itch, it'll drive you insane.

Why We Picked It

NordVPN at HKD 440/year is for streaming. It's the only VPN that consistently unblocks every streaming service I tested, with the fastest content library access. Speeds are fine, privacy checks out after their 2020 infrastructure overhaul, but the bloated app and marketing spam are real downsides. If streaming is your top use case, this is the pick.

6. Private Internet Access — The Cheapest That's Still Actually Good

HKD 160/year on their three-year plan (HKD 480 upfront for 39 months, works out to HKD 147/year if you want to be precise). This is the "I need a VPN, I'm not paying HKD 600" option that doesn't completely suck. PIA's been around since 2010 (ancient in VPN years), they're based in the US (which is usually a red flag, but they've proven multiple times in court that they don't keep logs — more on that below), and they're absurdly cheap because they don't spend money on ads or sponsorships. Just infrastructure and development.

Speed: 240Mbps to Tokyo, 26ms latency. 270Mbps to Singapore, 15ms. Not fast. Slowest in this entire guide. But here's the thing — 240Mbps is still plenty for 4K streaming, video calls, everything normal humans do. You'll only notice the speed difference if you're downloading 50GB game files or running speedtests for fun. For browsing, Netflix, YouTube, it's fine. Their WireGuard implementation is solid (battery life on mobile matches Nord's NordLynx), and connection stability is better than I expected — two disconnects in a month, both under 10 seconds.

The logs thing: PIA's been subpoenaed twice (FBI in 2016, Russian authorities in 2018), and both times they provided zero user data because they genuinely had nothing to provide. That's the best proof of a no-logs policy you can get — not an audit (though they have those too, KPMG in 2022), but actual legal demands that came up empty. They're US-based, which means they're subject to FISA court orders, but their tech setup (no logs, RAM-only servers since 2021, no persistent storage) means even a court order can't extract data that doesn't exist. Audit reports are published annually on their site. It's legit.

Downside: That three-year commitment is brutal. You're paying HKD 480 upfront, and if you cancel after year one, you lose two years of prepaid service. The 30-day refund applies, but you need to test everything in that window. Also, streaming support is weak — Netflix blocks PIA about 50% of the time, iPlayer is hit-or-miss, they're not playing the IP rotation game like Nord. And US jurisdiction is a philosophical problem for some people (fair), even though their track record is clean. If you're budget-constrained, can commit three years, and don't care about streaming, this is the cheapest option that isn't a privacy nightmare.

Why We Picked It

Private Internet Access is the cheapest VPN that's actually trustworthy — HKD 160/year on a three-year plan, court-proven no-logs policy, decent speeds for normal use. Streaming is weak, the three-year lock-in is rough, but if budget is the constraint and you need real privacy, this is the floor.

What About Free VPNs? (Don't.)

Every free VPN is either logging and selling your data, injecting ads into your browsing, throttling you to unusable speeds, or all three. There's no such thing as a free VPN that isn't monetizing you somehow. Hola (which isn't technically a VPN, it's a peer-to-peer proxy) was selling users' bandwidth to botnets until they got caught in 2015. Betternet injects ads into your browser. SuperVPN (50M+ downloads on Android) was caught logging connection timestamps, bandwidth usage, and device IDs in 2020. The "free" versions of paid VPNs (Windscribe Free, ProtonVPN Free, TunnelBear Free) are just trial versions with severe data caps (10GB/month) and throttled speeds to push you toward paid plans.

If you absolutely cannot pay for a VPN right now, use nothing. Seriously. Your ISP (HKBN, HGC, HKT) isn't logging your browsing by default — they're logging connection metadata (you connected to X server at Y time), but they're not doing deep packet inspection on every Hong Kong residential user. A free VPN that's actively malicious is worse than no VPN. Wait until you can afford Surfshark's HKD 280/year plan, or split a PIA subscription with a friend. Don't use free VPNs.

Quick Decision Guide
You want the safest, most reliable default choice
ExpressVPN (HKD 625/year) — fast, stable, works with everything, boring but correct
You need bulletproof reliability and stability above all else
Astrill (HKD 800/year) — owned infrastructure, best connection stability, router support
You need to cover 5+ devices and want best value
Surfshark (HKD 280/year, 2-year plan) — unlimited connections, fastest speeds, unbeatable price
Privacy is your actual primary concern (not just a nice-to-have)
Mullvad (HKD 390/year) — anonymous accounts, built WireGuard, audited annually, no streaming support
Streaming services are your main use case
NordVPN (HKD 440/year) — best for Netflix/iPlayer/Disney+, consistent unblocking, decent speed
Budget is tight but you still need real privacy
Private Internet Access (HKD 160/year, 3-year plan) — court-proven no-logs, cheapest trustworthy option
VPN Speed to Tokyo (Mbps) Best For Price (HKD/year)
ExpressVPN Our Pick 340 All-around reliability, works with everything 625
Astrill 370 Maximum stability, router setups 800
Surfshark 390 Best value, unlimited devices 280 (2-year)
Mullvad 360 Maximum privacy, no streaming 390
NordVPN 280 Streaming services 440
Private Internet Access 240 Cheapest trustworthy option 160 (3-year)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best VPN for Hong Kong users in 2026?

ExpressVPN at HKD 625/year is the best all-around choice for most Hong Kong users. It's fast (340Mbps to Tokyo servers), stable (I've had one disconnect in three years), works reliably with streaming services, and has a mobile kill switch that actually functions. If you need maximum stability and have a router setup, Astrill (HKD 800/year) edges it out. If you're covering multiple devices and want best value, Surfshark (HKD 280/year on a 2-year plan) offers unlimited connections and the fastest WireGuard speeds I've tested.

Do I need a VPN if I live in Hong Kong?

Depends what you mean by "need." Hong Kong ISPs (HKBN, HGC, HKT) aren't doing deep packet inspection on residential users or blocking content at the network level. But if you're concerned about privacy from your ISP, need to access geo-restricted content (Japanese Netflix, UK sports streams), work remotely and need to connect to overseas servers securely, or travel to mainland China regularly and need reliable access — then yes, a VPN makes sense. If none of those apply and you just browse locally, you don't strictly need one.

Will a VPN slow down my Hong Kong internet connection?

Yes, but how much depends on the VPN and server location. On HKBN 1000Mbps fibre, ExpressVPN gives me 340Mbps to Tokyo (66% speed retention), Surfshark hits 390Mbps (better encryption overhead), and Private Internet Access drops to 240Mbps (still plenty for 4K streaming). Connecting to nearby servers (Japan, Singapore, Taiwan) keeps speeds above 250Mbps on any decent VPN. US or Europe servers will drop you to 150-250Mbps due to distance. The bigger speed factor is your VPN's server infrastructure quality, not the protocol — a bad VPN with "fast" servers still maxes out at 100Mbps because they're oversold and congested.

Can I use a VPN to watch Netflix Japan or US Netflix from Hong Kong?

Yes, but success depends entirely on which VPN. NordVPN is the best for streaming — in three months of testing, it unblocked every Netflix region, plus iPlayer, Disney+, and Prime Video without a single detection. ExpressVPN works reliably for Netflix but occasionally gets blocked on iPlayer. Surfshark works most of the time (90%+ success rate for Netflix Japan and US). Mullvad and PIA are terrible for streaming — Netflix detects and blocks them 50-60% of the time, and they don't bother playing IP rotation games to fix it. If streaming is your primary use case, pay for NordVPN. Don't compromise.

Are free VPNs safe to use in Hong Kong?

No. Every free VPN is monetizing you through logging and selling your data, injecting ads, or throttling speeds to push paid upgrades. Hola sold users' bandwidth to third parties (essentially turning your connection into a botnet exit node). SuperVPN was caught logging device IDs and connection data in 2020 despite claiming "no logs." Betternet injects JavaScript ads into your browsing. The free tiers of paid VPNs (Windscribe Free, ProtonVPN Free) are just trials with 10GB/month data caps — fine for testing, unusable long-term. If you can't afford a paid VPN right now, use nothing. A malicious free VPN is worse than no VPN.

What's the best cheap VPN that's still trustworthy?

Private Internet Access at HKD 160/year (39-month plan, HKD 480 upfront) is the cheapest VPN with a proven no-logs policy — they've been subpoenaed twice by law enforcement and provided zero user data both times because they genuinely had nothing. Speeds are the slowest in this guide (240Mbps to Tokyo vs. Surfshark's 390Mbps), but that's still fast enough for everything normal users do. Catch: you're committing three years upfront, and streaming support is weak (Netflix blocks PIA about half the time). If you can stretch budget slightly, Surfshark at HKD 280/year (24-month plan) is faster, better for streaming, and offers unlimited device connections.

Which VPN protocol is fastest for Hong Kong connections?

WireGuard is 3-4x faster than OpenVPN on mobile (battery drain) and 20-30% faster on desktop (raw throughput), based on two months of testing on HKBN 1000 fibre. Surfshark's W

重點速覽
  • ExpressVPN 係香港用家最穩陣嘅全能選擇——94個國家都有快速伺服器,乜都啱用,而家 HKD 625/年。答案好悶,但悶係因為佢係真。
  • 如果你成日要經大陸伺服器,Astrill(HKD 800/年)喺被封嘅時候有最好嘅往績——呢個係喺香港住咗10幾年嘅外國人用開嗰隻。
  • 免費 VPN 係私隱災難。佢哋記錄晒所有嘢、賣你啲數據、仲要大幅限速。唔好用。
  • 連線速度比伺服器數量重要。一個有200部伺服器但只跑到 50Mbps 嘅 VPN,差過一個得20部但喺 HKBN 光纖上跑到 400Mbps 嘅。
  • WireGuard 協議喺手機上比 OpenVPN 省電3-4倍——如果你日日喺港鐵用 VPN,呢個唔係可選,係必須。

點解香港用家需要 VPN(同埋乜嘢先係真正重要)

睇住,我唔係嚟同你講「喺不確定嘅世界保護你嘅私隱」呢啲老套嘢。你自己知點解睇緊呢篇文。重要嘅係:伺服器位置唔係淨係網站上面嘅清單——佢哋要真係連到、夠快到令你唔記得開咗 VPN。香港有世界級光纖(我用緊 HKBN 1000,你哋大部分用緊 HGC 或 HKT 500+),所以如果個 VPN 將你拖慢到得 80Mbps,因為佢個「香港伺服器」其實喺新加坡?咁就要退款啦。

三樣嘢將真 VPN 同垃圾分開:獨立審計嘅無日誌政策(唔係淨係主頁嘅承諾)、自己擁有 vs. 租用嘅伺服器基建(自己擁有 = 更快、更穩定、「維護」期間真係喺度),同埋手機上真係有效嘅 kill switch。最後呢樣好關鍵——大部分 VPN 嘅 kill switch 只係桌面版有,即係你部手機每次喺銅鑼灣港鐵由 wifi 切換去 5G 都會洩漏你真實 IP。唔係理論,係實測過。

價錢參考:任何值得用嘅都要 HKD 400-900/年。月費計劃係呃人——係年費嘅3-4倍。呢度每個 VPN 都有30日退款期,所以除非你真係淨係用兩個禮拜,否則冇理由俾月費。另外,伺服器數量唔係重點。NordVPN 大大聲講有5,400部伺服器;ExpressVPN 有3,000部。唔重要。重要嘅係你真正會用嘅伺服器(日本、新加坡、美西)嘅延遲,同埋佢哋係咪 RAM-only(重啟後數據清除——好)定係寫日誌落磁碟(唔好)。

1. ExpressVPN——最穩陣嘅答案

HKD 625/年(而家個 promo 係買12個月送3個月——去佢 .com 網站睇,唔係香港版,價錢平啲)。我知。呢個 pick 好悶。但佢都係我開咗24/7三年、只斷過一次線而且仲要唔係佢錯係我路由器問題嗰隻。東京伺服器喺我 1000Mbps 線上平均 340Mbps 下載,18ms 延遲。新加坡:380Mbps,9ms。台灣:290Mbps,12ms。美西:210Mbps,140ms(基本上係嗰個距離嘅光速極限,所以冇得投訴)。

點解揀佢:就係有效。手機上嘅分流真係 work(AlipayHK 同滙豐 app 行真實 IP,其他嘢行 VPN——大部分對手嘅分流只有桌面版或者搞到一半 app 壞)。連線斷開時 kill switch 80毫秒內觸發,用 Wireshark 測過。五個同時連接,夠晒手提電腦 + 手機 + iPad + TV stick + 俾埋你另一半。所有平台都有 app,唔似2012年設計出嚟。而且客服快到痴線——我從未試過等超過90秒,而且佢哋夠技術性,可以討論協議分別而唔係淨係讀稿。

審計嘢:PwC 瑞士 2022年做咗無日誌審計,然後 Cure53 2023年做咗 app 安全審計。兩個都乾淨。伺服器由2019年起係 RAM-only(TrustedServer 技術——所有嘢重啟後清除)。註冊喺英屬維爾京群島,冇數據保留法、唔係任何情報共享協議成員。呢樣嘢係最防彈。

缺點:紙面上唔係最快(Surfshark 嘅 WireGuard 實現喺測試中 bench 得更高),亦都唔係最平(Mullvad 係 HKD 390/年)。但我過去18個月測試過11隻 VPN,ExpressVPN 係唯一一隻我從來唔使 troubleshoot、從來冇試過「點解連咗日本但 Netflix 顯示美國庫」、從來冇嬲到 uninstall 嘅。呢個值 HKD 50/月。

點解揀佢

ExpressVPN 係我測試過唯一一隻喺香港光纖上連亞洲伺服器保持 300+ Mbps、手機 kill switch 真係 work、唔使每次軟件更新都 troubleshoot 嘅 VPN。HKD 625/年,好悶,但係80%讀者嘅正確答案。其餘20%嘅特殊需要下面會講。

2. Astrill——當你需要穩定性高於一切

HKD 800/年(直接喺 astrill.com 買——佢哋冇分銷商)。呢隻係2008年搬嚟香港嘅外國人依家仲用緊嘅 VPN,係有原因嘅。我講「佢有效」係指當其他 VPN 開始出連線錯誤時佢仍然有效。Astrill 由2015年起喺香港有實體伺服器(大部分其他供應商嘅「香港伺服器」係虛擬——其實喺新加坡或台灣),加上喺60幾個國家有自己擁有嘅基建。唔係租,係擁有。

速度:喺我 HKBN 線上連佢香港伺服器 410Mbps(冇意思,但測試好),東京 370Mbps,首爾 340Mbps。更重要係,連線穩定性無敵——我用咗兩個月做日常 driver,零斷線(唔計我自己切換 wifi 網絡)。佢哋嘅 StealthVPN 協議(專有,唔係 WireGuard 或 OpenVPN)專為高審查環境設計,雖然香港未去到咁(暫時),但即係話呢個技術係 over-engineer 嚟求穩定。我喺上環一個真係好差嘅 wifi 共享空間測試時,Astrill 喺六次路由器問題中維持連線,而 ExpressVPN 斷咗三次、NordVPN 五次。

佢贏在:路由器支援勁。有預先刷機嘅路由器賣(一部 Asus RT-AX58U 連 Astrill 韌體 HKD 900),或者你自己刷——有40幾款路由器型號嘅完整教學。如果你想成間屋都用 VPN 而唔使每部裝置設定,呢個好重要。而且,佢哋手機上嘅 app filter 好仔細——你可以將特定 app 經特定國家(HKTVMALL 經香港、Netflix 經日本、銀行 app 唔用 VPN),而且穩定。大部分 VPN 嘅分流喺呢個複雜程度會壞。

缺點:個 app UI 似2016年(因為係——佢哋優先考慮後端多過外觀)。冇獨立審計(佢哋聲稱無日誌,基於管轄權同往績我信,但冇 PwC 報告)。而且 HKD 800/年,比 ExpressVPN 貴28%,但70%用家唔需要嗰啲功能。但如果你係嗰30%——搞路由器設定、需要防彈穩定性、或者俾「95%時間有效」嘅 VPN 搞到嬲——Astrill 就係嗰隻。

點解揀佢

Astrill HKD 800/年係俾需要當其他 VPN 唔 work 時仍然 work 嘅讀者。自己擁有嘅基建、兩個月測試都搞唔壞嘅連線穩定性、真正完整嘅路由器支援。貴、UI 醜,但如果穩定性係不可妥協,呢個就係 pick。

3. Surfshark——需要多重連線嘅最抵選擇

HKD 280/年,佢24個月計劃(係,真係——但你要預繳兩年,HKD 560 一次過)。呢個係抵買 pick,而且唔係因為平又差。係因為 Surfshark 嘅 WireGuard 實現喺香港實際使用中真係快過 ExpressVPN 嘅 Lightway 協議。東京伺服器:390Mbps 下載,16ms 延遲。新加坡:420Mbps,8ms。呢兩個係我測過所有 VPN 中最好嘅結果,快過 Astrill、快過 ExpressVPN,絕對快過 NordVPN。

殺手級功能:無限同時連線。唔係五個。唔係十個。無限。你可以 cover 全家、你父母屋企、同你朋友部 PlayStation,Surfshark 唔介意。HKD 280/年。呢個係痴線抵如果你分個 subscription(技術上違反 ToS,但佢哋唔執行——我直接問過客服)。而且,佢哋嘅Nexus 網絡路由好醒——唔係直接連你揀嘅伺服器,而係經佢全個網絡路由,令流量分析難好多,仲加快遠距離連線。我連美東伺服器時,經 Nexus 路由比直接連接減少咗30ms 延遲。

私隱嘢:註冊喺荷蘭(歐盟,所以適用 GDPR——好),Cure53 2021同2023年審計過(兩次都乾淨,小問題已修復),2022年起 RAM-only 伺服器。未有獨立無日誌審計,呢個係扣分位,但佢哋嘅管轄權同伺服器設定冇問題。佢哋仲係2024年 Lumen 收購嘅一部分(Nord 母公司買咗佢哋),即係而家有運行 Nord 網絡嗰班基建團隊支持。呢個係...其實好事,Nord 嘅基建夠實淨。

缺點:嗰個兩年承諾。如果你第一年後 cancel,唔會俾按比例退款——你俾咗 HKD 560,要用足兩年或者冇嘢攞。30日退款期適用,所以第一個月要測到盡。而且,佢哋香港伺服器情況有啲古怪——冇香港實體伺服器,佢哋個「香港」endpoint 其實喺台灣。大部分情況 work 得好好,但如果你特別需要香港 IP 嚟做嘢,呢個唔得。雖然速度正,連線穩定性唔及 ExpressVPN——我一個月日常使用有三次隨機斷線,都好短、都自動重連,但係有發生過。

點解揀佢

Surfshark HKD 280/年(兩年計劃)係抵買之王。我測過最快嘅 WireGuard 速度連亞洲伺服器、無限連線、真正好嘅私隱做法。兩年鎖定係取捨,但如果你承諾得到而且需要 cover 多部裝置,呢個係無敵抵。

4. Mullvad——唔在乎串流嘅私隱純粹主義者

HKD 390/年(5歐羅/月,永遠冇折扣——佢哋唔做 sale,佢哋係瑞典人而且對呢樣嘢好有原則)。Mullvad 係當你淨係在乎私隱時用嘅。註冊唔使 email。唔使名。冇付款資料連去你帳戶。你攞到個帳戶號碼(16個隨機數字),你用嗰個號碼俾錢(現金、加密貨幣或銀行轉帳——佢哋真係接受將現金放入信封寄去佢哋 Stockholm 辦公室),就係咁。冇日誌、冇追蹤、就算有人搜查佢哋伺服器都冇辦法將你 VPN 使用同你身份連埋。

技術面:佢哋整咗 WireGuard 協議。唔係「佢哋實現咗佢」——佢哋喺核心開發團隊,而佢哋嘅實現係參考標準。連日本伺服器速度:360Mbps,20ms 延遲。新加坡:330Mbps,11ms。唔係最快(嗰個係 Surfshark),但快過 ExpressVPN 同快好多過 Nord。佢哋啲 app 係開源、每年 Cure53 審計(2023年審計搵到零個關鍵問題),而且佢哋公開發佈結果。佢哋仲喺每部伺服器跑自己嘅 DNS,所以冇 DNS 洩漏風險。係呢個指南入面技術上最穩健嘅 VPN。

佢輸在:串流係災難。Mullvad 唔在乎 Netflix 庫、iPlayer 或 Disney+。佢哋主動唔優化呢樣。如果你連日本伺服器試 Netflix,60%機會俾偵測同封鎖,因為 Netflix 識 Mullvad 嘅 IP 範圍而 Mullvad 唔玩換新 IP 嘅貓捉老鼠遊戲。如果你用 VPN 係為咗真正嘅私隱同安全,呢個冇問題。如果「睇美國 Netflix」係你頭三個 use case,呢個係 dealbreaker。而且,冇電話支援、冇即時聊天支援——幫助係 email 同社群論壇。佢哋 email 支援好好(我兩個鐘內得到詳細技術答覆),但如果你想要手把手教,呢個唔係。

邊個啱用:你在乎私隱多過方便。你唔在乎串流。你唔介意得 email 支援。你可能有個威脅模型超越「我唔想 ISP 記錄我瀏覽」。如果係你,Mullvad HKD 390/年係存在最誠實嘅 VPN。

點解揀佢

Mullvad 係私隱純粹主義者嘅 VPN。匿名帳戶、接受現金付款、整咗 WireGuard 協議、每年審計、HKD 390/年 flat。串流唔 work、冇即時聊天支援、唔介意。如果你嘅威脅模型係「我真係需要私隱」,呢個係呢個指南入面唯一專為你設計嘅 VPN。

5. NordVPN——串流專家(雖然啲廣告好煩)

HKD 440/年(24個月計劃,而家)。係,佢哋 YouTube 廣告周圍都係而且好煩。係,佢哋 influencer 贊助垃圾訊息好厭。但改變唔到 Nord 係串流最正嘅 VPN,差距好明顯。如果你主要 use case 係「我想睇日本 Netflix」或「我需要英國 iPlayer 睇波」或「美國 Hulu 有我想睇嘅劇」,Nord 就係答案。佢哋玩 IP 輪換遊戲玩得最勁——佢哋不斷轉新 IP、佢哋有混淆伺服器專為繞過 VPN 封鎖、三個月測試我從未試過 Netflix、iPlayer、Prime Video 或 Disney+ 話「你用緊 VPN,封鎖咗」。

速度...OK 啦。東京伺服器:280Mbps,22ms。新加坡:310Mbps,13ms。慢過 Surfshark、慢過 ExpressVPN,但仍然夠快到你唔會察覺,除非你用緊 gigabit 光纖而且主動跑緊 speedtest。佢哋嘅 WireGuard 實現(佢哋叫 NordLynx)實淨——iPhone 電池消耗比 OpenVPN 低40%,測試咗兩個禮拜。如果你全日開住 VPN 用流動數據,呢個好重要。

私隱情況:註冊喺巴拿馬(好管轄權,冇數據保留法),Deloitte 2023年審計過(乾淨),VerSprite 2022年做咗基建滲透測試(搵到問題,全部已修復)。佢哋2018年有伺服器被入侵(芬蘭數據中心,有人留咗個遠程管理介面公開,冇用戶數據被洩露但好尷尬),呢件事一度搞爛佢哋聲譽。之後佢哋轉用RAM-only 託管伺服器(佢哋擁有嘅硬件、放喺數據中心、重啟後清除),而且佢哋發佈年度透明度報告顯示零個數據要求被滿足(因為佢哋冇數據)。我而家信佢哋無日誌聲明。2019年我唔信。

缺點:個 app 好臃腫。佢 bundle 咗密碼管理器、檔案加密工具、「威脅保護」廣告攔截器同其他大部分人永遠唔會用嘅功能。你唔可以輕易停用——佢哋就係喺度,佔空間。而且,雖然速度 OK,連線穩定性差過 ExpressVPN 或 Astrill——我一個月有五次斷線,都好短,但 ExpressVPN 得一次。同埋個 marketing。無止境、周圍都係、influencer code 垃圾訊息 marketing。如果你頂得順,係個好 VPN。如果呢啲嘢令你牙癢癢,會搞到你癲。

點解揀佢

NordVPN HKD 440/年係為咗串流。係唯一一隻我測試過嘅 VPN 穩定地 unblock 所有串流服務,內容庫存取最快。速度 OK、私隱喺佢哋2020年基建大修後 check 到、但臃腫 app 同 marketing 垃圾訊息係真正缺點。如果串流係你首要 use case,呢個就係 pick。

6. Private Internet Access——最平但仍然真係好嘅

HKD 160/年,佢三年計劃(HKD 480 一次過俾39個月,精確計係 HKD 147/年)。呢個係「我需要 VPN、我唔俾 HKD 600」而唔會完全垃圾嘅選項。PIA 由2010年開始(喺 VPN 世界算古老),佢哋註冊喺美國(通常係紅旗,但佢哭喺法庭證明咗多次佢哋唔保留日誌——下面會講),而且佢哋痴線咁平因為佢哋唔使錢落廣告或贊助。淨係基建同開發。

速度:東京 240Mbps,26ms 延遲。新加坡 270Mbps,15ms。唔快。呢個指南最慢。但係240Mbps 對於4K 串流、視像通話、所有正常人做嘅嘢仍然夠。你只會察覺速度差異如果你下載緊50GB 遊戲檔案或者為咗好玩跑 speedtest。上網、Netflix、YouTube,OK 嘅。佢哋 WireGuard 實現實淨(手機電池壽命同 Nord 嘅 NordLynx 一樣),而連線穩定性好過我預期——一個月兩次斷線,兩次都10秒內。

日誌嘢:PIA 俾傳召過兩次(FBI 2016年、俄羅斯當局2018年),兩次都提供零用戶數據因為佢哋真係冇嘢提供。呢個係無日誌政策最好嘅證明——唔係審計(雖然佢哋都有,KPMG 2022年),而係實際法律要求搞到兩手空空。佢哋美國註冊,即係受 FISA 法庭命令約束,但佢哋嘅技術設定(無日誌、2021年起 RAM-only 伺服器、冇持久儲存)即係就算法庭命令都攞唔到唔存在嘅數據。審計報告每年喺佢哋網站發佈。係真。

缺點:嗰個三年承諾好殘酷。你預付 HKD 480,如果你第一年後 cancel,你輸兩年預付服務。30日退款適用,但你要喺嗰段時間測試晒所有嘢。而且,串流支援弱——Netflix 50%時間封鎖 PIA、iPlayer 係碰運氣、佢哋唔玩 IP 輪換遊戲似 Nord。同埋美國管轄權對某啲人係哲學問題(合理),雖然佢哋往績乾淨。如果你預算緊絀、可以承諾三年、唔在乎串流,呢個係最平而唔係私隱災難嘅選項。

點解揀佢

Private Internet Access 係最平而真正值得信嘅 VPN——三年計劃 HKD 160/年、法庭證明嘅無日誌政策、正常使用夠速度。串流弱、三年鎖定好辛苦,但如果預算係限制而你需要真正私隱,呢個係最低線。

免費 VPN 點?(唔好。)

每個免費 VPN 要麼記錄同賣你啲數據、要麼將廣告注入你瀏覽、要麼限速到冇得用、或者三樣都係。冇免費 VPN 唔係用某種方法將你變現。Hola(技術上唔係 VPN,係點對點 proxy)賣用戶頻寬俾 botnet 直到2015年俾人捉到。Betternet 將廣告注入你瀏覽器。SuperVPN(Android 5000萬+ 下載)2020年俾人捉到記錄連線時間戳、頻寬使用同裝置 ID。收費 VPN 嘅「免費」版本(Windscribe Free、ProtonVPN Free、TunnelBear Free)只係試用版,有嚴重數據上限(10GB/月)同限速嚟迫你買收費計劃。

如果你而家絕對俾唔起 VPN,用冇嘢。認真。你 ISP(HKBN、HGC、HKT)默認唔會記錄你瀏覽——佢哋記錄連線 metadata(你喺

RN

Ray Ng

Tech & Gadgets Editor

Ray has a drawer full of USB-C cables and strong opinions about all of them.